Be Right Back, Uninstalling
Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Printable Version

+- Be Right Back, Uninstalling (https://www.brbuninstalling.com)
+-- Forum: General Category (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://www.brbuninstalling.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=59)
+--- Thread: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) (/showthread.php?tid=8600)



Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - sarcasticsteve - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 11:09 AM)at0m link Wrote: [quote author=Chronomaster link=topic=1507.msg87385#msg87385 date=1243872277]
[quote author=Sponson link=topic=1507.msg87374#msg87374 date=1243870977]
Quote:"Personally the Pyro is my favorite," Wolpaw said. "It's pretty much logistics. As far as I know, nobody out there hates the Pyro." (Joked Walker: "We all hate the Sniper, not the Pyro.")

Oh boy, is he wrong.
Why hello there Pyro. What are you doing here in this tight, compact corridor?
[/quote]You, if Rule 63 has anything to say about it. 0_o
[/quote]

I think you are thinking Rule 34

Quote:Rule 63 is a rule of the internet that reads as follows: "For any given male character, there is a female version of that character." This rule's exceptions are only in the instance that A: the male character is already so androgynous that a female version would be basically the same, or B: the female version hasn't been drawn yet.

Fyre fits into the first exception


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Versus - 06-01-2009

giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Sponson - 06-01-2009

What? Did someone say rule 63? Huh?
Who?


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - fyre - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 01:16 PM)Sarcastic Steve link Wrote: [quote author=Urban Dictionary]
Rule 63 is a rule of the internet that reads as follows: "For any given male character, there is a female version of that character." This rule's exceptions are only in the instance that A: the male character is already so androgynous that a female version would be basically the same, or B: the female version hasn't been drawn yet.

Fyre fits into the first exception
[/quote]

I don't have boobies.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Squishy3 - 06-01-2009

Metal Gear Solid Rising on 360 featuring Raiden. May also mean MGS4 being ported to 360, but that's all we've gotten so far.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - cbre88x - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 01:58 PM)Squishy3 link Wrote: May also mean MGS4 being ported to 360

If it was going to happen they would have DEF. mentioned it. They never mentioned it at all. Not even a hint.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - at0m - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 01:44 PM)Versus-pwny- link Wrote: giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
this.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - K2 - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 10:42 AM)Sponson link Wrote:
Quote:"Personally the Pyro is my favorite," Wolpaw said. "It's pretty much logistics. As far as I know, nobody out there hates the Pyro." (Joked Walker: "We all hate the Sniper, not the Pyro.")

Oh boy, is he wrong.

There have been quite a few times where I sincerely wished they would just get rid of the Pyro altogether.


(06-01-2009, 02:19 PM)cbre88x link Wrote: [quote author=Squishy3 link=topic=1507.msg87454#msg87454 date=1243882715]
May also mean MGS4 being ported to 360

If it was going to happen they would have DEF. mentioned it. They never mentioned it at all. Not even a hint.
[/quote]

Which pisses me off.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Squishy3 - 06-01-2009

I'm honestly still surprised they haven't announced it considering it's free money.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - CaffeinePowered - 06-01-2009

http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st01/st01801.htm


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - fyre - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 03:17 PM)Caffeine link Wrote: http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st01/st01801.htm

Niiice.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - cbre88x - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 03:00 PM)K2 link Wrote: [quote author=cbre88x link=topic=1507.msg87456#msg87456 date=1243883955]
If it was going to happen they would have DEF. mentioned it. They never mentioned it at all. Not even a hint.
Which pisses me off.
[/quote]

If it was going to happen it would have happened already.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Versus - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 03:33 PM)fyre link Wrote: [quote author=Caffeine link=topic=1507.msg87488#msg87488 date=1243887462]
http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st01/st01801.htm

Niiice.
[/quote]


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Fail Medic - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 03:17 PM)Caffeine link Wrote: http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st01/st01801.htm

That's fine, Massachusetts.  Knock yourself out.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - chronomaster - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 01:44 PM)Versus-pwny- link Wrote: giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
Or it would have sex with me if I was a female me.

I'd have sex with me, I would.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Versus - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 11:18 PM)Chronomaster link Wrote: [quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=1507.msg87450#msg87450 date=1243881866]
giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
Or it would have sex with me if I was a female me.

I'd have sex with me, I would.
[/quote]

MY OWN CLONE

NOW NEITHER OF US WILL BE VIRGINS


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Honest - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 11:25 PM)Versus-pwny- link Wrote: [quote author=Chronomaster link=topic=1507.msg87651#msg87651 date=1243916301]
[quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=1507.msg87450#msg87450 date=1243881866]
giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
Or it would have sex with me if I was a female me.

I'd have sex with me, I would.
[/quote]

MY OWN CLONE

NOW NEITHER OF US WILL BE VIRGINS
[/quote]

[Image: Robotnikvirgins.jpg]


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - at0m - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 11:18 PM)Chronomaster link Wrote: [quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=1507.msg87450#msg87450 date=1243881866]
giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
Or it would have sex with me if I was a female me.

I'd have sex with me, I would.
[/quote]I wouldn't get along with a female me, let alone hump her.


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Scary Womanizing Pig Mask - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 11:33 PM)at0m link Wrote: [quote author=Chronomaster link=topic=1507.msg87651#msg87651 date=1243916301]
[quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=1507.msg87450#msg87450 date=1243881866]
giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
Or it would have sex with me if I was a female me.

I'd have sex with me, I would.
[/quote]I wouldn't get along with a female me, let alone hump her.
[/quote]

I don't think I'd even get along with a male me >.<


Re: Neat stuff (non-lulz but interesting things) - Honest - 06-01-2009

(06-01-2009, 11:46 PM)Scary Womanizing Pig Mask link Wrote: [quote author=at0m link=topic=1507.msg87656#msg87656 date=1243917219]
[quote author=Chronomaster link=topic=1507.msg87651#msg87651 date=1243916301]
[quote author=Versus-pwny- link=topic=1507.msg87450#msg87450 date=1243881866]
giant :Smile goes here

rule 63 = gender change, i.e. rule 63 on the heavy would be a female heavy.

as in, he would have sex with the pyro if it was a female pyro.
Or it would have sex with me if I was a female me.

I'd have sex with me, I would.
[/quote]I wouldn't get along with a female me, let alone hump her.
[/quote]

I don't think I'd even get along with a male me >.<
[/quote]

I know I would. <3 SWPM