Be Right Back, Uninstalling

Full Version: Fuck, SCII delayed to next year
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Shock level = 0
Good
(08-05-2009, 05:20 PM)ZargonX link Wrote: [ -> ]Shock level < 0
(08-05-2009, 05:20 PM)ZargonX link Wrote: [ -> ]Shock level = 0
still, darn

Professor Funbucks

(08-05-2009, 05:21 PM)Benito Mussolini link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=ZargonX link=topic=3410.msg104083#msg104083 date=1249510844]
Shock level < 0
[/quote]
(08-05-2009, 05:23 PM)zaneyard link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=ZargonX link=topic=3410.msg104083#msg104083 date=1249510844]
Shock level = 0
[/quote]

rumsfald

SCII = Star Control II.

I gonna kill you and Smokey because you playin' with my emotions...

Duck, Duck, Goose

pretty sure this was known a fuckton while back, you know, when they started saying that they wanted a 6-8 month beta but we were already halfway through 2009

simple math
...oh well?
Star Control II <3
(08-05-2009, 05:21 PM)jörge link Wrote: [ -> ]Good
As long as DIII is released before it.
(08-05-2009, 06:41 PM)SUPER MACHO MAN link Wrote: [ -> ]As long as DIII is released before it.

itll probably come out in 2013 (fosrs)
I thought this game was going to come out on 2010, this is no news
(08-05-2009, 05:24 PM)Professor Funbucks link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Benito Mussolini link=topic=3410.msg104085#msg104085 date=1249510910]
[quote author=ZargonX link=topic=3410.msg104083#msg104083 date=1249510844]
Shock level < 0
[/quote]
[/quote]
Okaaay, so Blizz just said they are delaying SCII because they want to fix Battle.net to make it more like "Xbox Live" (i don't know what they mean with this)

So this just reaffirms my theory that they are planning to
A) Charge a monhtly fee to pplay on Battle.net
B) Add WoW to Battle.net and use the same currency (aka instead of WoW subscriptions you buy Battle.net subscriptions wich allow to play SCII, WoW and Diablo III)

It makes sense to me, mostly because of the decisition of not Including LAN. This way they will prevent people from using Hamachi or programs like Garena so the only way for people to play is through Battle.net
(08-06-2009, 10:45 AM)Vongore link Wrote: [ -> ]Okaaay, so Blizz just said they are delaying SCII because they want to fix Battle.net to make it more like "Xbox Live" (i don't know what they mean with this)

So this just reaffirms my theory that they are planning to
A) Charge a monhtly fee to pplay on Battle.net
B) Add WoW to Battle.net and use the same currency (aka instead of WoW subscriptions you buy Battle.net subscriptions wich allow to play SCII, WoW and Diablo III)

It makes sense to me, mostly because of the decisition of not Including LAN. This way they will prevent people from using Hamachi or programs like Garena so the only way for people to play is through Battle.net

Or maybe they're trying to stop pirating by forcing people to get serial keys and that making people pay a monthly fee to play an RTS online is too dumb of a business plan for anyone except possibly EA to try.
(08-06-2009, 02:10 PM)HONESTLY A DOGMOBILE link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Vongore link=topic=3410.msg104184#msg104184 date=1249573515]
Okaaay, so Blizz just said they are delaying SCII because they want to fix Battle.net to make it more like "Xbox Live" (i don't know what they mean with this)

So this just reaffirms my theory that they are planning to
A) Charge a monhtly fee to pplay on Battle.net
B) Add WoW to Battle.net and use the same currency (aka instead of WoW subscriptions you buy Battle.net subscriptions wich allow to play SCII, WoW and Diablo III)

It makes sense to me, mostly because of the decisition of not Including LAN. This way they will prevent people from using Hamachi or programs like Garena so the only way for people to play is through Battle.net

Or maybe they're trying to stop pirating by forcing people to get serial keys and that making people pay a monthly fee to play an RTS online is too dumb of a business plan for anyone except possibly EA to try.
[/quote]

but then you realize blizzard has become a greedy corporation squeezing every dime they can out of the consumer
(08-06-2009, 02:11 PM)beep beep cockfaced douchebag link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=HONESTLY A DOGMOBILE link=topic=3410.msg104219#msg104219 date=1249585825]
[quote author=Vongore link=topic=3410.msg104184#msg104184 date=1249573515]
Okaaay, so Blizz just said they are delaying SCII because they want to fix Battle.net to make it more like "Xbox Live" (i don't know what they mean with this)

So this just reaffirms my theory that they are planning to
A) Charge a monhtly fee to pplay on Battle.net
B) Add WoW to Battle.net and use the same currency (aka instead of WoW subscriptions you buy Battle.net subscriptions wich allow to play SCII, WoW and Diablo III)

It makes sense to me, mostly because of the decisition of not Including LAN. This way they will prevent people from using Hamachi or programs like Garena so the only way for people to play is through Battle.net

Or maybe they're trying to stop pirating by forcing people to get serial keys and that making people pay a monthly fee to play an RTS online is too dumb of a business plan for anyone except possibly EA to try.
[/quote]

but then you realize blizzard has become a greedy corporation squeezing every dime they can out of the consumer
[/quote]
IIRC, Blizzard stated that they will not make people pay to play on Bnet
also, it's a horrible business plan and absolutely no one will buy it if they do. an idiot can even see that.
and as far as the no lan, who the fuck really cares. you know a crack or workaround is going to be made 2 seconds after release anyway.
Pages: 1 2 3 4