Be Right Back, Uninstalling

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/top-10...down/61859

It's....man it's bad.

(02-12-2010, 08:15 PM)Karthkarthkarth link Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.gametrailers.com/video/top-10...down/61859

It's....man it's bad.

It is?  Taken from the context of games being influential to the decade, Everything but the first two are pretty important.  Sure the presentation is pretty dumb, but that's expected.

It wasn't that bad really, though I agree with the first two also.  Twilight Princess is nothing more than Wii gimmicks that could've been easily done with a controller, based heavily on Ocarina of Time, though I still loved it, it wasn't exactly groundbreaking. 

And Super Mario Galaxy was boring.  I liked Sunshine more and I hated that game lol Running around circular worlds and flipping around all the time wasn't what a Mario game needed.

The rest I don't mind too much.  Half-Life 2 and WoW were expected...At least GTA3 wasn't GTA4 or I would've had to punch someone in the nuts lol I'd agree with RE4.  It may have left behind it's survival roots for action, but I rarely played a game as many times I did as RE4...Across three consoles.  Two or three plays on Gamecube, two or three plays on the PS2, and then a failed play on the Wii cause the controls suck lol  And Shadow of the Colossus was good, but it hardly led the way for future games since there hasn't been another game like it yet.  I guess God of War could count, but that came out around the same time involving big baddies you could crawl on and attack.

I thought overall it was a decent list. I'm curious as to what your list would look like Karth.

(02-12-2010, 10:02 PM)Trace link Wrote: [ -> ]I thought overall it was a decent list. I'm curious as to what your list would look like Karth.

Pretty much no nintendo games. and more games that ACTUALLY lead innovation in gameplay. So many overlooked things. I mean, Sam & Max was the first game series to do Episodic Gaming right, Crysis is the best looking game ever, etc. etc.

I think Crysis showed that no matter how good it looked and how much your PC sucked to be able to run it at high qualities, that isn't everything if the game itself is boring as hell lol

(02-12-2010, 10:07 PM)Maxon link Wrote: [ -> ]I think Crysis showed that no matter how good it looked and how much your PC sucked to be able to run it at high qualities, that isn't everything if the game itself is boring as hell lol

Was thinking of it because of the graphical enhancements, not the gameplay.

karth i think your idea of top 10 would be less of a top 10 best games and more of a grammy kind of thing

Hit and miss, world of warcraft shouldn't be on it because as far as I'm concerned it's not a videogame it's a drug. Innovative gameplay, control, design and aesthetic =/= overly addictive, repetitive piece of shit. But whatever, we all have our own top 10, and no ones list will ever be the same.

Based on importance/influence, and popularity I'd say it's a reasonable list.  Most of the older games mentioned spawned tons of changes and influenced other games' development.  Though I think New Super Mario Bros Wii should replace Mario Galaxy.  WoW sucks, yeah, but it's popular, and you can't say every MMO out there hasn't tried to be the next WoW.

Not a terrible list.  Karth, make a personal top 10 games of the decade list.  I'm curious as to what other games you might have in mind.

lol, twilight princess, more like ocarina of time

(02-13-2010, 03:28 PM)diggs link Wrote: [ -> ]lol, twilight princess, more like ocarina of time

top ten games of the decade stupid.

You people are weird. 

(02-13-2010, 04:40 PM)jeff link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=diggs link=topic=4200.msg136712#msg136712 date=1266092906]
lol, twilight princess, more like ocarina of time

top ten games of the decade stupid.
[/quote]

pacman collection GAME OF THE DECADE

also why is wow on there if anything its made mmos worse

WoW was actually done pretty well imo, how many of you have actually played it?

(02-13-2010, 05:25 PM)Duck link Wrote: [ -> ]WoW was actually done pretty well imo, how many of you have actually played it?

Played it a few times.

(02-13-2010, 07:53 PM)Maxon link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Duck link=topic=4200.msg136728#msg136728 date=1266099931]
WoW was actually done pretty well imo, how many of you have actually played it?

Played it a few times.
[/quote]

On and off, on right now.

(02-13-2010, 08:27 PM)Eschatos link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Maxon link=topic=4200.msg136745#msg136745 date=1266108838]
[quote author=Duck link=topic=4200.msg136728#msg136728 date=1266099931]
WoW was actually done pretty well imo, how many of you have actually played it?

Played it a few times.
[/quote]

On and off, on right now.
[/quote]

my issue with wow is that its the smb's of mmos, nothing special but not terrible either. def does not deserve NUMBER 1 GAME OF THE DECADE!!!!

I think the problem with lists like these is when they don't define their criteria.  Best game of the decade vs. Most Important game of the decade vs. Most Influential game of the decade, etc... they can all be very different things.  WoW might not be the best game, but it's certainly influential.