First cw game in stalker-4n on the new purple map. Dropped it first and did +1100 damage with it against wolves and stormcrows.
Another big CW event this weekend. I'm down for some CW action.
(04-20-2015, 01:16 PM)Surf314 link Wrote: [ -> ]Another big CW event this weekend. I'm down for some CW action.
I am as well. Though we should limit our participation to only those who have a full or mostly full drop deck. (IE not running any trial mechs). That also means running meta builds. It sucks but you really do need to run optimized builds to be successful in CW.
(04-20-2015, 01:46 PM)Dadtrain323i link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Surf314 link=topic=7498.msg284523#msg284523 date=1429553771]
Another big CW event this weekend. I'm down for some CW action.
I am as well. Though we should limit our participation to only those who have a full or mostly full drop deck. (IE not running any trial mechs). That also means running meta builds. It sucks but you really do need to run optimized builds to be successful in CW.
[/quote]
Same and agreed.
will be FS9-A, TDR-9SE©, TDR-9S, STK-4N
Id like to but I dont think I;ll have a deck or time this week.
(04-20-2015, 04:53 PM)matter11 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Dadtrain323i link=topic=7498.msg284524#msg284524 date=1429555580]
[quote author=Surf314 link=topic=7498.msg284523#msg284523 date=1429553771]
Another big CW event this weekend. I'm down for some CW action.
I am as well. Though we should limit our participation to only those who have a full or mostly full drop deck. (IE not running any trial mechs). That also means running meta builds. It sucks but you really do need to run optimized builds to be successful in CW.
[/quote]
Same and agreed.
will be FS9-A, TDR-9SE©, TDR-9S, STK-4N
[/quote]
I have the same deck except sub firestarter for Raven 2x.
(04-20-2015, 10:31 PM)Surf314 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=matter11 link=topic=7498.msg284525#msg284525 date=1429566821]
[quote author=Dadtrain323i link=topic=7498.msg284524#msg284524 date=1429555580]
[quote author=Surf314 link=topic=7498.msg284523#msg284523 date=1429553771]
Another big CW event this weekend. I'm down for some CW action.
I am as well. Though we should limit our participation to only those who have a full or mostly full drop deck. (IE not running any trial mechs). That also means running meta builds. It sucks but you really do need to run optimized builds to be successful in CW.
[/quote]
Same and agreed.
will be FS9-A, TDR-9SE©, TDR-9S, STK-4N
[/quote]
I have the same deck except sub firestarter for Raven 2x.
[/quote]
Is that the one with ballistics? I was considering using my raven-3L now since I finally reconfigured it. Don't you think the 3L fits the CW meta better?
(04-21-2015, 04:59 PM)matter11 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Surf314 link=topic=7498.msg284529#msg284529 date=1429587116]
[quote author=matter11 link=topic=7498.msg284525#msg284525 date=1429566821]
[quote author=Dadtrain323i link=topic=7498.msg284524#msg284524 date=1429555580]
[quote author=Surf314 link=topic=7498.msg284523#msg284523 date=1429553771]
Another big CW event this weekend. I'm down for some CW action.
I am as well. Though we should limit our participation to only those who have a full or mostly full drop deck. (IE not running any trial mechs). That also means running meta builds. It sucks but you really do need to run optimized builds to be successful in CW.
[/quote]
Same and agreed.
will be FS9-A, TDR-9SE©, TDR-9S, STK-4N
[/quote]
I have the same deck except sub firestarter for Raven 2x.
[/quote]
Is that the one with ballistics? I was considering using my raven-3L now since I finally reconfigured it. Don't you think the 3L fits the CW meta better?
[/quote]
The 2x is the one with 2 LLs and 2 MLs. The reduced burn time quirks are insane and makes it a lot easier to target the full burn on a single component. The general consensus in CW seems to be less brawling and more poking, so a light with good range would probably work better. Of course it really depends on strategy.
The 3L is a great compromise between the range and damage of the 2x and the utility of ECM. I think it would probably be better than the A.
(04-21-2015, 10:23 PM)Surf314 link Wrote: [ -> ]The general consensus in CW seems to be less brawling and more poking
This is definitely the first tip I would like people eyeing CW to read.
It'll help people decide what mechs to run. There obviously is SOME brawling but even most of that is long range brawling. If there's a big close range mess around omega that's usually because attackers are dominating or light rushing.