Be Right Back, Uninstalling

Windows only: Security applications frequently make themselves quite a bear to truly remove. That's great when their stubbornness protects you from malicious software—not so great when you just want them gone.

AppRemover is a free application that specializes in stubborn, clingy security applications. Why would you want to remove security software? If you're replacing one security application with another or have a conflict between two security applications you have installed, it can be tricky to fully remove the offending application completely. AppRemover is a simple application with a basic wizard-driven menu system. It scans your system for security applications against an extensive list—you can view it here—and then you can remove all or selected security applications from your computer. AppRemover is freeware, Windows only.

AppRemover [via gHacks]

-Steve

ITT: McAfee and Norton users.

(05-02-2009, 08:50 PM)Blues link Wrote: [ -> ]ITT: McAfee and Norton users.

People still use Norton? *gasp*

<--Avast user

(05-02-2009, 09:54 PM)Sarcastic Steve link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
ITT: McAfee and Norton users.

People still use Norton? *gasp*

<--Avast user
[/quote]
Isn't McAfee one of the better security applications?

(aside it being free for my family)

I never had issues with it when I used to use it, I just find Avast stronger and better

(05-02-2009, 11:10 PM)Karf the Walrus link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Sarcastic Steve link=topic=2799.msg80120#msg80120 date=1241319268]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
ITT: McAfee and Norton users.

People still use Norton? *gasp*

<--Avast user
[/quote]
Isn't McAfee one of the better security applications?

(aside it being free for my family)
[/quote]
See that program up there that Steve linked? They made it because of programs like McAfee. Enjoy your aids.

Also, on a more serious note for your sake, McAfee being on the "better side of antivirus" is about as much of a joke as the program itself.

NOD32 anyone?

Crazy Slovaks serve me well.

(05-03-2009, 09:38 AM)Geoff link Wrote: [ -> ]NOD32 anyone?

Crazy Slovaks serve me well.

Good stuff, I'm just too lazy to keep updating and cracking, so I switched to Avast.

Since we're on the subject of comparing AV apps while we're at it   How does AVG rate vs avast and nod32?

Norton used to suck, but the new versions don't anymore- they took a chainsaw to the memory footprint.  McAfee on the other hand... I am not a fan of.  It works, but it's slow and keeps telling me I have to "OMG VERIFY YUR SUBSCRIPTION".

(05-02-2009, 08:50 PM)Blues link Wrote: [ -> ]ITT: I state my opinion which is NEVER WRONG!

i see a pattern

(05-04-2009, 06:29 PM)Dave link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
ITT: I state my opinion which is NEVER WRONG!

i can't seem to get off your dick about it EVER
[/quote]

I see a pattern.

Quote:Karrde link=topic=2799.msg80347#msg80347 date=1241453103]
Since we're on the subject of comparing AV apps while we're at it   How does AVG rate vs avast and nod32?

Different strokes. I'd say after using AVG and Avast that they're about equal. I've just come to prefer Avast's notifications (text bubbles) vs. the popup AVG gives. I used NOD32, and it's great too, but it takes a bit more to customize it "out of the box" and like said, cracking each new version gets a bit annoying, you're just as well off using AVG/Avast unless you want the extras you can get from NOD.

(05-04-2009, 06:32 PM)Blues link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Dave link=topic=2799.msg80468#msg80468 date=1241479789]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
This wasn't my original post

mine either
[/quote]

Cocks, dicks, and zounds more!

[/quote]
I'm definitely seeing a pattern here.

(05-04-2009, 07:57 PM)Karf the Walrus link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80470#msg80470 date=1241479961]
[quote author=Dave link=topic=2799.msg80468#msg80468 date=1241479789]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
This wasn't my original post

mine either
[/quote]

Cocks, dicks, and zounds more!

[/quote]
I'm definitely seeing a pattern here.
[/quote]

Welcome to the internet, where if your not a hooting dickhole trying to make a point while simultaneously mocking someone else in a passive aggressive fashion, you just aren't doing it right.

(05-04-2009, 08:18 PM)Honest link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Karf the Walrus link=topic=2799.msg80500#msg80500 date=1241485034]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80470#msg80470 date=1241479961]
[quote author=Dave link=topic=2799.msg80468#msg80468 date=1241479789]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
This wasn't my original post

mine either
[/quote]

Cocks, dicks, and zounds more!

[/quote]
I'm definitely seeing a pattern here.
[/quote]

Welcome to the internet, where if your not a hooting dickhole trying to make a point while simultaneously mocking someone else in a passive aggressive fashion, you just aren't doing it right.
[/quote]

Passive aggressive?

(05-05-2009, 03:14 PM)K2 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Honest link=topic=2799.msg80503#msg80503 date=1241486290]
[quote author=Karf the Walrus link=topic=2799.msg80500#msg80500 date=1241485034]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80470#msg80470 date=1241479961]
[quote author=Dave link=topic=2799.msg80468#msg80468 date=1241479789]
[quote author=Blues link=topic=2799.msg80115#msg80115 date=1241315458]
This wasn't my original post

mine either
[/quote]

Cocks, dicks, and zounds more!

[/quote]
I'm definitely seeing a pattern here.
[/quote]

Welcome to the internet, where if your not a hooting dickhole trying to make a point while simultaneously mocking someone else in a passive aggressive fashion, you just aren't doing it right.
[/quote]

Passive aggressive?
[/quote]

Well no one's called the other a faggot yet so give it a minute.

faggot.

Cunt.

pube

First one to Goodwin's law wins. Ready, steady, GO