Be Right Back, Uninstalling

Full Version: BF: Bad company 2?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Anybody already plan on getting this (like me)? I was really bummed about MW2 on pc plus when it reset my stats I wasn't a happy camper. So don't be a be a pussy! Buy this game so il have friends to play with ( I was paid an undisclosed sum to push a game that doesn't come out for another 3 months).
I might considering getting it just to spite IW, even though I've generally not been a fan of the battlefield games
will drop mw2 for bc2 when it comes out
I'll probably buy it because I thought it looked neat and DICE have really got their shit together on the PC version it looks like.
Gunna try out the beta when it comes out and see what I think. Defiantly liking how they're giving the PC version a lot of attention though. Kinda hopin for another online game that'll hold my attention for more than a week besides TF2 and L4D. Even madballs sorta lost its appeal. :-\
I've been wanting this game more than MW2.  Not sure what system I'll get it for, though maybe PC.  Not doing it to spite IW or anything, I just really loved the first game and so far it's looking to be even better.  Nothing more exciting than decimating a house to clear out campers Big Grin
(12-08-2009, 04:47 PM)Maxon link Wrote: [ -> ]I've been wanting this game more than MW2.  Not sure what system I'll get it for, though maybe PC.  Not doing it to spite IW or anything, I just really loved the first game and so far it's looking to be even better.  Nothing more exciting than decimating a house to clear out campers Big Grin
I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC
I will definitely buy this game, looks very fun. Can't wait for the PC beta! Hopefully my computer can run it decently though.
(12-08-2009, 08:13 PM)Squishy3 link Wrote: [ -> ]I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC

Well they aren't advertising it as such, just that they've come out to the gaming community as saying that they'll be fully supporting the PC side due to the negative press of MW2.

Also 1943 really isn't that big of a deal lol It's get boring pretty quick with only the couple of maps and simple classes.  Might be alittle better on PC due to having 32 players, but it's a pretty bare shooter.
(12-17-2009, 12:00 AM)Maxon link Wrote: [ -> ]http://kotaku.com/5428367/battlefield-ba...nama-canal

Tight. On my watch-list now for sure.
(12-11-2009, 07:17 PM)Maxon link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Squishy3 link=topic=3946.msg125710#msg125710 date=1260321189]I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC

Well they aren't advertising it as such, just that they've come out to the gaming community as saying that they'll be fully supporting the PC side due to the negative press of MW2.

Also 1943 really isn't that big of a deal lol It's get boring pretty quick with only the couple of maps and simple classes.  Might be alittle better on PC due to having 32 players, but it's a pretty bare shooter.
[/quote]

Why would any of us want 1943?  1942 has been around longer and is proven to be great.
(12-17-2009, 08:25 AM)Eschatos link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Maxon link=topic=3946.msg126335#msg126335 date=1260577069]
[quote author=Squishy3 link=topic=3946.msg125710#msg125710 date=1260321189]I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC

Well they aren't advertising it as such, just that they've come out to the gaming community as saying that they'll be fully supporting the PC side due to the negative press of MW2.

Also 1943 really isn't that big of a deal lol It's get boring pretty quick with only the couple of maps and simple classes.  Might be alittle better on PC due to having 32 players, but it's a pretty bare shooter.
[/quote]

Why would any of us want 1943?  1942 has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want TF2? TFC has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want HL2? HL has been around longer and is proven to be great.
[/quote]

Durp.
(12-17-2009, 09:38 AM)Spore link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Eschatos link=topic=3946.msg127269#msg127269 date=1261056304]
[quote author=Maxon link=topic=3946.msg126335#msg126335 date=1260577069]
[quote author=Squishy3 link=topic=3946.msg125710#msg125710 date=1260321189]I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC

Well they aren't advertising it as such, just that they've come out to the gaming community as saying that they'll be fully supporting the PC side due to the negative press of MW2.

Also 1943 really isn't that big of a deal lol It's get boring pretty quick with only the couple of maps and simple classes.  Might be alittle better on PC due to having 32 players, but it's a pretty bare shooter.
[/quote]

Why would any of us want 1943?  1942 has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want TF2? TFC has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want HL2? HL has been around longer and is proven to be great.
[/quote]

Durp.
[/quote]

Except 1943 is literally the exact same game as 1942, except with fewer maps, fewer classes, and better graphics.
(12-17-2009, 10:57 AM)K2 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Spore link=topic=3946.msg127276#msg127276 date=1261060738]
[quote author=Eschatos link=topic=3946.msg127269#msg127269 date=1261056304]
[quote author=Maxon link=topic=3946.msg126335#msg126335 date=1260577069]
[quote author=Squishy3 link=topic=3946.msg125710#msg125710 date=1260321189]I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC

Well they aren't advertising it as such, just that they've come out to the gaming community as saying that they'll be fully supporting the PC side due to the negative press of MW2.

Also 1943 really isn't that big of a deal lol It's get boring pretty quick with only the couple of maps and simple classes.  Might be alittle better on PC due to having 32 players, but it's a pretty bare shooter.
[/quote]

Why would any of us want 1943?  1942 has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want TF2? TFC has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want HL2? HL has been around longer and is proven to be great.
[/quote]

Durp.
[/quote]

Except 1943 is literally the exact same game as 1942, except with fewer maps, fewer classes, and better graphics.
[/quote]
(12-17-2009, 10:57 AM)K2 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Spore link=topic=3946.msg127276#msg127276 date=1261060738]
[quote author=Eschatos link=topic=3946.msg127269#msg127269 date=1261056304]
[quote author=Maxon link=topic=3946.msg126335#msg126335 date=1260577069]
[quote author=Squishy3 link=topic=3946.msg125710#msg125710 date=1260321189]I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC

Well they aren't advertising it as such, just that they've come out to the gaming community as saying that they'll be fully supporting the PC side due to the negative press of MW2.

Also 1943 really isn't that big of a deal lol It's get boring pretty quick with only the couple of maps and simple classes.  Might be alittle better on PC due to having 32 players, but it's a pretty bare shooter.
[/quote]

Why would any of us want 1943?  1942 has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want TF2? TFC has been around longer and is proven to be great.
Why would any of us want HL2? HL has been around longer and is proven to be great.
[/quote]

Durp.
[/quote]

Except 1943 is literally the exact same game as 1942, except with fewer maps, fewer classes, and better graphics.
[/quote]

Can't argue with that, I'm just saying the way he stated his distaste for 1943 was silly.
Nerco.

I want to gauge interest in BF: BC2. Specifically, I am looking for people who are interested in pre-ordering and starting the Beta with me on Jan. 28th.

http://eastore.ea.com/store/ea/en_US/Dis...3842139224

Depending on community support, I am very strongly leaning towards running a dedicated server for this game. BRB needs to continue to grow upwards and onwards, and I think BC2 is a great game to do that with.
Well I'm getting the game, though probably for the 360.  Hoping some friends get it to so that we can play together, though I'll have to double check.  If they don't plan to get it, I might change my pre-order to the PC version.
I'll be picking up this game considering im a bf fan.
(12-08-2009, 08:13 PM)Squishmas link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Maxon link=topic=3946.msg125683#msg125683 date=1260308870]
I've been wanting this game more than MW2.  Not sure what system I'll get it for, though maybe PC.  Not doing it to spite IW or anything, I just really loved the first game and so far it's looking to be even better.  Nothing more exciting than decimating a house to clear out campers Big Grin
I don't like how they're marketing the fact they have dedicated servers over MW2 considering they ignored PC with the first one and 1943 still hasn't come out for PC
[/quote]

you didn't miss much with 1943. It was fun for sure but only have 3 weapon groups to chose from and no 1 shot kills with sniper rifle made me give it a thumbs down.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32