sweet, didn't see me in there. I'm sure you'll get me though.
Ka-BEWM! I didn't actually think I'd be on there. I would have thought I would remember something like that. Of course, it's been a lot of confusing, explody goodness, lately.
I have updated the wall of shame
hahahahahahahaha coppanuva got killed by a flare
I've made two crit rocket reflect kills in the past three days. I am proud of myself.
I approve of reflect tampon kills.
(12-11-2009, 12:17 AM)TVs Luca link Wrote: [ -> ]Hah! You haven't gotten me...yet!
Also burn all Demomenz. Make it easier for our Soldier buddies to kill them.
I'm an equal opportunity burner.
haven't gotten me yet sucka
im just 2legit2quit
(12-15-2009, 03:38 PM)jeff link Wrote: [ -> ]haven't gotten me yet sucka
im just 2legit2quit
I do not like the wall of shame...
Might as well add to Caff's
Not a rightous reflect kill if you don't taunt afterwards.
I've got the same problem Kirby. ROCK ON
Can you "beat" my rig for lag in TF2?
2.8Ghz Intel P4, HyperThreading... Thats right baby, ONE CORE!
1GB PC-4500 DDR
ATi Radeon X1650XT .... AGP
Originally I had 5 Harddrives, 3 IDE and 2 SATA, buuut!
The IDE controller, if left turned on in BIOS, will hard-lock my computer anywhere between 1-10 minutes after boot, or if I try to access ANY IDE drive that isn't Primary on Channel 1, so now I'm down to my 320GB and 1TB SATA drives. Interestingly, because of the aging and decrepit southbridge, it will only operate them at less than IDE speeds.
Check these mad frames out, yo.
BTW, screenie isn't resized for forums, either. =/
<img deleted>
Who wants to donate to the buy-Kirby-a-raging-awesome-new-computer fund? Increments of $500 only plx.
The problem isn't the videocard, I could run TF2 @ 1280x960 with full AA/AF, it's the CPU
(12-16-2009, 05:57 PM)Kirby link Wrote: [ -> ]The problem isn't the videocard, I could run TF2 @ 1280x960 with full AA/AF, it's the CPU
Sorry man, but a 1650 ain't gonna run TF2 at those specs. I used to run an AMD 3000+ with a 6600GT and capped at 1024x768, no AA to get playable 20-40 range. And this was launch TF2. You would need to scrap the whole computer with that tech anyways.
I was using a Pentium D with an 6800GT AGP.
Was running 800x600 with all features turned off..
Ran alright.
Less bitch, more feature turning down of....eh.
(12-16-2009, 11:08 PM)HeK link Wrote: [ -> ]I was using a Pentium D with an 6800GT AGP.
Was running 800x600 with all features turned off..
Ran alright.
Less bitch, more feature turning down of....eh.
When you upgraded did it feel like you got sent into the future?
(12-16-2009, 11:11 PM)Surf314 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=HeK link=topic=3962.msg127229#msg127229 date=1261022932]
I was using a Pentium D with an 6800GT AGP.
Was running 800x600 with all features turned off..
Ran alright.
Less bitch, more feature turning down of....eh.
When you upgraded did it feel like you got sent into the future?
[/quote]
Not really, I work with multi-million dollar near-supercomputers on a daily basis.
It is nice that I don't get frame dropout tho.