(06-02-2014, 01:32 PM)FlyingMongoose link Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpbOEoRrHyU
On the other side of the coin, the FCC's website is now overloaded and there are tens of thousands of comments that are largely off topic. Also John Oliver did a terrible job of explaining the issue.
(06-02-2014, 03:47 PM)Surf314 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=FlyingMongoose link=topic=52.msg278883#msg278883 date=1401733970]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpbOEoRrHyU
On the other side of the coin, the FCC's website is now overloaded and there are tens of thousands of comments that are largely off topic. Also John Oliver did a terrible job of explaining the issue.
[/quote]
That may be, but he did raise awareness of the topic, which ultimately is a good thing.
(06-02-2014, 03:47 PM)Surf314 link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=FlyingMongoose link=topic=52.msg278883#msg278883 date=1401733970]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpbOEoRrHyU
On the other side of the coin, the FCC's website is now overloaded and there are tens of thousands of comments that are largely off topic. Also John Oliver did a terrible job of explaining the issue.
[/quote]
I wonder if anyone has put an ascii dickbutt in the comments and submitted it
(06-02-2014, 06:31 PM)FlyingMongoose link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Surf314 link=topic=52.msg278886#msg278886 date=1401742020]
[quote author=FlyingMongoose link=topic=52.msg278883#msg278883 date=1401733970]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpbOEoRrHyU
On the other side of the coin, the FCC's website is now overloaded and there are tens of thousands of comments that are largely off topic. Also John Oliver did a terrible job of explaining the issue.
[/quote]
That may be, but he did raise awareness of the topic, which ultimately is a good thing.
[/quote]
Except everyone thinks that almost the opposite of what is happening is what is happening. It's not like we have net neut and the FCC is trying to get rid of it because cable companies. It's more like the FCC is trying to figure out how they can do net neut or some functional equivalent under the authority Congress gave them and it keeps getting struck down by courts. This is the latest iteration of them trying to make new rules after the old ones are no longer in place. All the comments I read are essentially useless because they are like don't take our net neut away and that is completely irrelevant. I feel like it's going to drown out comments of people actually trying to suggest something they can do that will work under the current laws.
Edit: Looking through some more of them, I can almost guarantee the FCC is going to say something along the lines of "we received an overwhelming amount of comments from the public concerned about the open internet and wanting protections now, therefore we will proceed with the proposed plan to quickly restore open internet protections within the confines of the judicial precedent." And honestly, this would not be a misinterpretation of the comments - but everyone will still freak the fuck out because they don't know what they are supporting or why.
(06-11-2014, 12:51 AM)Dtrain323i link Wrote: [ -> ]
left handedlazy people problems
The Steyr AUG has a left and right ejection port. The shooter needs to flip the cover and change the bolt and extractor.
(06-11-2014, 06:13 AM)HeK link Wrote: [ -> ][quote author=Dtrain323i link=topic=52.msg279046#msg279046 date=1402465886]
gun
left handedlazy people problems
The Steyr AUG has a left and right ejection port. The shooter needs to flip the cover and change the bolt and extractor.
[/quote]
It probably wouldn't matter with that little contact time, but how hot is brass right out of the extractor?
It matters, and it burns. Not permanent damage, but enough to not be fun at all. I give the guy props for barely grimising.
that stache is all the lip protection he needs
did you ever think that maybe he just really likes kissing hot bullet casings stop being so insensitive you jerks
ALL IS LOST. I haven't laughed this hard in ages, and I don't even like basketball.